<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 266 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the respondents were not entitled to the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 89/95-C.E. for payment of duty on waste and scrap as they cleared such goods from a factory manufacturing excisable goods in addition to exempted goods. The duty demand was upheld, and penalties were modified and set aside. The Tribunal emphasized strict interpretation of exemption notifications to prevent undue benefits to the assessee. The previous judgment cited by the respondents was distinguished as not applicable to the current scenario. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were accepted, and the original duty demand orders were restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:59:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 266 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the respondents were not entitled to the benefit of exemption under Notification No. 89/95-C.E. for payment of duty on waste and scrap as they cleared such goods from a factory manufacturing excisable goods in addition to exempted goods. The duty demand was upheld, and penalties were modified and set aside. The Tribunal emphasized strict interpretation of exemption notifications to prevent undue benefits to the assessee. The previous judgment cited by the respondents was distinguished as not applicable to the current scenario. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were accepted, and the original duty demand orders were restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>