<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 265 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under the Central Excise Act on an assessee and an Ex-General Manager for goods not entered in production records. Confiscation of semi-finished goods was released as no evidence of fully manufactured unaccounted goods was found. The Tribunal emphasized that goods requiring testing/approval need not be entered in production records. Penalties and confiscation were overturned, with duty demands on released goods upheld. Duty on seized goods was not confirmed, stressing the importance of accounting for fully manufactured goods for appropriate duty payment. Appeals were allowed, and orders modified accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 265 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties imposed under the Central Excise Act on an assessee and an Ex-General Manager for goods not entered in production records. Confiscation of semi-finished goods was released as no evidence of fully manufactured unaccounted goods was found. The Tribunal emphasized that goods requiring testing/approval need not be entered in production records. Penalties and confiscation were overturned, with duty demands on released goods upheld. Duty on seized goods was not confirmed, stressing the importance of accounting for fully manufactured goods for appropriate duty payment. Appeals were allowed, and orders modified accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>