<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1983 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471209</link>
    <description>Jurisdictional validity of assessments and reassessments issued in the name of an amalgamated, non-existing company requires determination of whether merger information was furnished to the Assessing Officer before notice issuance or during assessment proceedings. This threshold issue governs consideration of the warranty-provision disallowance. Additional evidence on warranty expenditure requires factual examination. The matters were remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication after opportunity to both sides.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 18:23:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1983 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471209</link>
      <description>Jurisdictional validity of assessments and reassessments issued in the name of an amalgamated, non-existing company requires determination of whether merger information was furnished to the Assessing Officer before notice issuance or during assessment proceedings. This threshold issue governs consideration of the warranty-provision disallowance. Additional evidence on warranty expenditure requires factual examination. The matters were remitted to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh adjudication after opportunity to both sides.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>