https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797624 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 will generally not be exercised to resolve disputed facts concerning service of a show cause notice, hearing notice, or order-in-original where an efficacious statutory appeal is available. Allegations of non-service and denial of hearing, disputed by assertions of service through speed post, email, and the web portal, should be examined by the appellate authority. The petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy, with the appellate authority directed to consider on merits any request to exclude the time spent pursuing the writ petition. en-us Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:55:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797624 Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 will generally not be exercised to resolve disputed facts concerning service of a show cause notice, hearing notice, or order-in-original where an efficacious statutory appeal is available. Allegations of non-service and denial of hearing, disputed by assertions of service through speed post, email, and the web portal, should be examined by the appellate authority. The petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy, with the appellate authority directed to consider on merits any request to exclude the time spent pursuing the writ petition. Case-Laws GST Fri, 07 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797624