<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1450 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797576</link>
    <description>Statutory power to frame service rules includes power to amend, vary or rescind them under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act. Deletion of the promotion bar for technical employees was valid because it was ordered by the Registrar; communication by the Additional Registrar did not affect the exercise of that authority. A legislative laying requirement using &quot;shall&quot; is directory where it prescribes no consequence for non-compliance and does not make tabling a condition precedent to operation. Accordingly, non-tabling before the Legislative Assembly did not invalidate the amendment, and the employee&#039;s promotional status, seniority, consequential benefits and partial back wages were restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:34:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1450 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797576</link>
      <description>Statutory power to frame service rules includes power to amend, vary or rescind them under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act. Deletion of the promotion bar for technical employees was valid because it was ordered by the Registrar; communication by the Additional Registrar did not affect the exercise of that authority. A legislative laying requirement using &quot;shall&quot; is directory where it prescribes no consequence for non-compliance and does not make tabling a condition precedent to operation. Accordingly, non-tabling before the Legislative Assembly did not invalidate the amendment, and the employee&#039;s promotional status, seniority, consequential benefits and partial back wages were restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>