https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797579 Under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, disciplinary authorities must assess proven breaches and impose proportionate consequences. Appellate interference with a discretionary decision to levy a monetary penalty instead of revoking a Customs Broker licence is limited to arbitrariness, perversity, or legal error; an appellate body cannot substitute its preferred view merely because another outcome is possible. Licence revocation, which affects business operations and livelihood, is not automatic for every regulatory breach. Proven misconduct must support the sanction, as suspicion alone cannot establish liability. In the absence of arbitrariness, perversity, or legal infirmity, a monetary penalty rather than licence revocation remains sustainable. en-us Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:34:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797579 Under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, disciplinary authorities must assess proven breaches and impose proportionate consequences. Appellate interference with a discretionary decision to levy a monetary penalty instead of revoking a Customs Broker licence is limited to arbitrariness, perversity, or legal error; an appellate body cannot substitute its preferred view merely because another outcome is possible. Licence revocation, which affects business operations and livelihood, is not automatic for every regulatory breach. Proven misconduct must support the sanction, as suspicion alone cannot establish liability. In the absence of arbitrariness, perversity, or legal infirmity, a monetary penalty rather than licence revocation remains sustainable. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797579