<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1456 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797582</link>
    <description>Associated Enterprise status under section 92A requires the foundational test of direct or indirect participation in management, control or capital; the circumstances listed in section 92A(2), including commercial dependence or distributor exclusivity, do not independently establish that status. Internal CUP comparability does not require identical contractual terms. Contractual differences must be assessed for their material effect on price, and reasonably accurate, objectively verifiable adjustments must be considered under Rule 10B(3). Where CUP cannot be reliably applied after that assessment, the most appropriate method must be selected independently under section 92C and Rules 10B and 10C for royalty benchmarking.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:34:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1456 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797582</link>
      <description>Associated Enterprise status under section 92A requires the foundational test of direct or indirect participation in management, control or capital; the circumstances listed in section 92A(2), including commercial dependence or distributor exclusivity, do not independently establish that status. Internal CUP comparability does not require identical contractual terms. Contractual differences must be assessed for their material effect on price, and reasonably accurate, objectively verifiable adjustments must be considered under Rule 10B(3). Where CUP cannot be reliably applied after that assessment, the most appropriate method must be selected independently under section 92C and Rules 10B and 10C for royalty benchmarking.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>