<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 138 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellants regarding refund claims totaling Rs. 14,924 and Rs. 6,705, as unjust enrichment did not apply. The higher duty amounts were not passed on to the buyers, as they were debited and corrected through credit notes and debit notes, respectively. The Tribunal found that the excess duty amounts were not received by the appellants, leading to the rejection of the unjust enrichment claim and granting relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:31:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 138 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellants regarding refund claims totaling Rs. 14,924 and Rs. 6,705, as unjust enrichment did not apply. The higher duty amounts were not passed on to the buyers, as they were debited and corrected through credit notes and debit notes, respectively. The Tribunal found that the excess duty amounts were not received by the appellants, leading to the rejection of the unjust enrichment claim and granting relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>