<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1474 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797600</link>
    <description>Stamp-duty payment is not unexplained investment under Section 69 where the assessee substantiates its source through funds received from a father-in-law. The father-in-law&#039;s income-tax return established identity and financial capacity, while the supporting material on creditworthiness was neither disputed nor independently discredited. The explanation for the payment source was therefore sufficiently supported, precluding an addition as unexplained investment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:34:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1474 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797600</link>
      <description>Stamp-duty payment is not unexplained investment under Section 69 where the assessee substantiates its source through funds received from a father-in-law. The father-in-law&#039;s income-tax return established identity and financial capacity, while the supporting material on creditworthiness was neither disputed nor independently discredited. The explanation for the payment source was therefore sufficiently supported, precluding an addition as unexplained investment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>