<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mandatory e-way bill generation before movement makes subsequent production ineffective against tax-evasion penalties for intercepted taxable goods.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103061</link>
    <description>Rule 138(1) requires prescribed information to be furnished and an e-way bill generated before taxable goods begin moving. Transport without an e-way bill at interception was treated as establishing intent to evade tax, because later online generation could not cure the failure of statutory monitoring or prevent potential account manipulation. A manually issued invoice was not regarded as an equivalent safeguard. The appellate authority&#039;s contrary reliance on precedent was distinguished, and the original tax and penalty order under the detention provisions was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:34:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:34:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory e-way bill generation before movement makes subsequent production ineffective against tax-evasion penalties for intercepted taxable goods.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103061</link>
      <description>Rule 138(1) requires prescribed information to be furnished and an e-way bill generated before taxable goods begin moving. Transport without an e-way bill at interception was treated as establishing intent to evade tax, because later online generation could not cure the failure of statutory monitoring or prevent potential account manipulation. A manually issued invoice was not regarded as an equivalent safeguard. The appellate authority&#039;s contrary reliance on precedent was distinguished, and the original tax and penalty order under the detention provisions was restored.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 08:34:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>