<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 230 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53404</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the respondents in a case concerning Modvat credit eligibility for goods transferred between units of the same company and the validity of invoices lacking the &quot;duplicate for transporter&quot; inscription. The Tribunal held that endorsed invoices are acceptable for claiming Modvat credit in such inter-unit transfers where no sale occurs. Additionally, the presence of a rubber stamp with the required wording on invoices was deemed valid, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision affirmed the respondents&#039; entitlement to claim Modvat credit based on the endorsed invoices, establishing precedence for similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 230 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53404</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, ruled in favor of the respondents in a case concerning Modvat credit eligibility for goods transferred between units of the same company and the validity of invoices lacking the &quot;duplicate for transporter&quot; inscription. The Tribunal held that endorsed invoices are acceptable for claiming Modvat credit in such inter-unit transfers where no sale occurs. Additionally, the presence of a rubber stamp with the required wording on invoices was deemed valid, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The decision affirmed the respondents&#039; entitlement to claim Modvat credit based on the endorsed invoices, establishing precedence for similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>