<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 134 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53401</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of M/s. Dalmia Biscuits Pvt. Ltd., holding that transport charges collected should not be included in the assessable value of goods they manufactured. The Tribunal emphasized that excise duty is on the manufacture of goods, not on profit from transportation charges, and cited previous Supreme Court judgments to support their decision. They set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and allowed the appeal, stating that any profit from transport activities should not be part of the assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:18:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 134 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53401</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of M/s. Dalmia Biscuits Pvt. Ltd., holding that transport charges collected should not be included in the assessable value of goods they manufactured. The Tribunal emphasized that excise duty is on the manufacture of goods, not on profit from transportation charges, and cited previous Supreme Court judgments to support their decision. They set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and allowed the appeal, stating that any profit from transport activities should not be part of the assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>