<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 228 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a redemption fine on imported dates that did not meet food standards, rejecting the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to set aside the fine after re-export permission was granted. The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue that the violation of food standards warranted the fine and penalty, citing a previous judgment. It concluded that the goods were liable for confiscation, finding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision not in line with the law. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, confirming the original fine and Order-in-Original.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:16:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 228 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the imposition of a redemption fine on imported dates that did not meet food standards, rejecting the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to set aside the fine after re-export permission was granted. The Tribunal agreed with the Revenue that the violation of food standards warranted the fine and penalty, citing a previous judgment. It concluded that the goods were liable for confiscation, finding the Commissioner (Appeals) decision not in line with the law. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Revenue, confirming the original fine and Order-in-Original.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>