https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471173 Challenges to prosecution sanction should ordinarily be raised before the criminal court conducting the proceedings, particularly where validity, genuineness, application of mind, or the material considered by the sanctioning authority involve disputed facts. Statutory objections to sanction, including any resulting failure of justice, may be pursued before the Special Judge and in appellate or revisional proceedings. A writ court may decline to exercise territorial or discretionary jurisdiction where the criminal proceedings, charge sheet, cognizance and trial are connected to another forum offering an efficacious remedy. Reconsideration of an earlier refusal to sanction is permissible on fresh material, material infirmity, or previously unconsidered relevant facts, but not on identical material. en-us Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Aug 2026 15:23:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471173 Challenges to prosecution sanction should ordinarily be raised before the criminal court conducting the proceedings, particularly where validity, genuineness, application of mind, or the material considered by the sanctioning authority involve disputed facts. Statutory objections to sanction, including any resulting failure of justice, may be pursued before the Special Judge and in appellate or revisional proceedings. A writ court may decline to exercise territorial or discretionary jurisdiction where the criminal proceedings, charge sheet, cognizance and trial are connected to another forum offering an efficacious remedy. Reconsideration of an earlier refusal to sanction is permissible on fresh material, material infirmity, or previously unconsidered relevant facts, but not on identical material. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471173