<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1641 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471163</link>
    <description>In a multi-party appeal, non-substitution of legal representatives of a deceased respondent does not automatically abate the entire appeal. Continuation depends on whether the right to sue survives, the deceased party&#039;s estate is adequately represented by existing parties, the decree is joint and indivisible, and further proceedings could result in conflicting or inexecutable decrees. Co-owners who instituted proceedings concerning jointly owned land may represent the common estate, while non-contesting co-sharers may remain proper parties. A court must assess these factors before treating an appeal as wholly abated and should decide the merits if effective, non-conflicting adjudication remains possible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 10:32:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1641 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471163</link>
      <description>In a multi-party appeal, non-substitution of legal representatives of a deceased respondent does not automatically abate the entire appeal. Continuation depends on whether the right to sue survives, the deceased party&#039;s estate is adequately represented by existing parties, the decree is joint and indivisible, and further proceedings could result in conflicting or inexecutable decrees. Co-owners who instituted proceedings concerning jointly owned land may represent the common estate, while non-contesting co-sharers may remain proper parties. A court must assess these factors before treating an appeal as wholly abated and should decide the merits if effective, non-conflicting adjudication remains possible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>