https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53391 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating Commissioner for re-quantifying the duty demand on the complete furniture supplied by the appellants within the normal period of limitation. The extended period for demanding duty was deemed unjustified due to the department's prior knowledge of the appellants' operations. The appellants were granted a reasonable opportunity to present their case, ensuring a fair resolution of the duty liability issue. en-us Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:44:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53391 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the adjudicating Commissioner for re-quantifying the duty demand on the complete furniture supplied by the appellants within the normal period of limitation. The extended period for demanding duty was deemed unjustified due to the department's prior knowledge of the appellants' operations. The appellants were granted a reasonable opportunity to present their case, ensuring a fair resolution of the duty liability issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53391