https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797520 Judicial review of Settlement Commission orders made in discretionary jurisdiction is limited to statutory contravention, prejudice, fraud, bias, mala fides, or comparable jurisdictional defects. The adequacy and evidentiary value of material offered to substantiate reversal of CENVAT credit remain within the Settlement Commission's domain and cannot be reassessed in writ proceedings as though on appeal. A request for statutory records and invoices to verify the reversal was within the scope of an earlier remand permitting further information. As no jurisdictional infirmity was established, rejection of the claimed CENVAT-credit adjustment remained undisturbed. en-us Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:33:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797520 Judicial review of Settlement Commission orders made in discretionary jurisdiction is limited to statutory contravention, prejudice, fraud, bias, mala fides, or comparable jurisdictional defects. The adequacy and evidentiary value of material offered to substantiate reversal of CENVAT credit remain within the Settlement Commission's domain and cannot be reassessed in writ proceedings as though on appeal. A request for statutory records and invoices to verify the reversal was within the scope of an earlier remand permitting further information. As no jurisdictional infirmity was established, rejection of the claimed CENVAT-credit adjustment remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797520