<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1402 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797528</link>
    <description>Interim status quo protecting the company&#039;s assets continues pending appointment of a valuer and determination of the proposed buyout of the appellant&#039;s shareholding. The valuation process had not begun because no valuer had been appointed, and preservation of the existing position remained necessary until that process could proceed. Allegations of oppression and mismanagement were not adjudicated in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:33:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1402 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797528</link>
      <description>Interim status quo protecting the company&#039;s assets continues pending appointment of a valuer and determination of the proposed buyout of the appellant&#039;s shareholding. The valuation process had not begun because no valuer had been appointed, and preservation of the existing position remained necessary until that process could proceed. Allegations of oppression and mismanagement were not adjudicated in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>