<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 243 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53389</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ordered that the stay granted earlier will continue until the appeal is disposed of. The Superintendent of Central Excise cannot issue a notice to vacate the stay before the appeal is decided. The notice asking for deposit is illegal. The Superintendent must withdraw the notice or face contempt proceedings. The appeal is scheduled for hearing on 2-9-2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:38:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 243 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53389</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ordered that the stay granted earlier will continue until the appeal is disposed of. The Superintendent of Central Excise cannot issue a notice to vacate the stay before the appeal is decided. The notice asking for deposit is illegal. The Superintendent must withdraw the notice or face contempt proceedings. The appeal is scheduled for hearing on 2-9-2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>