<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1424 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797550</link>
    <description>Assessment issued and completed in the name of an amalgamating bank after its merger is jurisdictionally invalid where the Assessing Officer knew that the bank had ceased to exist. Such invalidity is not a procedural defect curable under Section 292B, and the successor entity&#039;s participation cannot validate proceedings against a non-existent entity. The assessment is therefore void from inception and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:33:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1424 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797550</link>
      <description>Assessment issued and completed in the name of an amalgamating bank after its merger is jurisdictionally invalid where the Assessing Officer knew that the bank had ceased to exist. Such invalidity is not a procedural defect curable under Section 292B, and the successor entity&#039;s participation cannot validate proceedings against a non-existent entity. The assessment is therefore void from inception and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>