<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1432 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797558</link>
    <description>Property-purchase additions treated as unexplained money were unsustainable where agreements to sell, cash-flow statements corroborated by bank records, family income-tax returns, loan confirmations, sale deeds, and booking and payment records established the sources and legitimacy of the transactions. The documented evidence sufficiently explained the funds used to acquire the two properties, requiring deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 08:33:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1432 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797558</link>
      <description>Property-purchase additions treated as unexplained money were unsustainable where agreements to sell, cash-flow statements corroborated by bank records, family income-tax returns, loan confirmations, sale deeds, and booking and payment records established the sources and legitimacy of the transactions. The documented evidence sufficiently explained the funds used to acquire the two properties, requiring deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>