<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1441 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797567</link>
    <description>Actuarially determined ad hoc contributions made to eliminate accumulated funding deficits in an approved superannuation fund are not ordinary annual contributions subject to the Rule 87 ceiling. Their character depends on the purpose of curing the gap between fund assets and actuarial liabilities, including deficits carried from earlier years, rather than on whether deficit funding recurs. Such payments are also distinct from initial contributions. Applying the annual ceiling to necessary actuarial-deficit funding would undermine fund solvency and conflict with the deduction framework for approved superannuation funds. A reasoned appellate determination based on applicable precedents is not arbitrary or perverse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 10:23:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1441 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797567</link>
      <description>Actuarially determined ad hoc contributions made to eliminate accumulated funding deficits in an approved superannuation fund are not ordinary annual contributions subject to the Rule 87 ceiling. Their character depends on the purpose of curing the gap between fund assets and actuarial liabilities, including deficits carried from earlier years, rather than on whether deficit funding recurs. Such payments are also distinct from initial contributions. Applying the annual ceiling to necessary actuarial-deficit funding would undermine fund solvency and conflict with the deduction framework for approved superannuation funds. A reasoned appellate determination based on applicable precedents is not arbitrary or perverse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>