<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 250 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53381</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty on imports made before the exemption notification, ruling that the duty collected under the rescinded notification remained valid. The majority decision dismissed the appeals, affirming the lower appellate authority&#039;s order and confirming the duty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:37:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 250 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53381</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of anti-dumping duty on imports made before the exemption notification, ruling that the duty collected under the rescinded notification remained valid. The majority decision dismissed the appeals, affirming the lower appellate authority&#039;s order and confirming the duty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>