<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1895 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471151</link>
    <description>Employee stock option scheme expenditure actually incurred and cross-charged by a parent entity is deductible as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. Characterising the cost as notional, contingent or capital does not justify disallowance where jurisdictional High Court and coordinate bench rulings recognise ESOP costs as revenue expenditure. Consistency also supports deduction where the identical issue on unchanged facts has been accepted for the same taxpayer in an earlier assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 22:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1895 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471151</link>
      <description>Employee stock option scheme expenditure actually incurred and cross-charged by a parent entity is deductible as business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act. Characterising the cost as notional, contingent or capital does not justify disallowance where jurisdictional High Court and coordinate bench rulings recognise ESOP costs as revenue expenditure. Consistency also supports deduction where the identical issue on unchanged facts has been accepted for the same taxpayer in an earlier assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>