<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1896 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471152</link>
    <description>Penalty proceedings for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars require a notice that clearly specifies the applicable charge. Retaining both alternative limbs in a notice under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c), without striking out the inapplicable limb, prevents an effective response and invalidates the proceedings. Assessment context or separately recorded satisfaction does not cure this defect. The penalty was consequently deleted because the notice failed to identify the precise charge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 22:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1896 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471152</link>
      <description>Penalty proceedings for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars require a notice that clearly specifies the applicable charge. Retaining both alternative limbs in a notice under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c), without striking out the inapplicable limb, prevents an effective response and invalidates the proceedings. Assessment context or separately recorded satisfaction does not cure this defect. The penalty was consequently deleted because the notice failed to identify the precise charge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>