<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1898 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471154</link>
    <description>Cash deposits supported by documentary evidence of land-sale proceeds cannot be treated as unexplained. The sale deed and bank statement established that part of the deposits arose from the land sale, requiring deletion of the addition to that extent. The balance deposit remained unexplained because no satisfactory source was established, and the addition was sustained for that portion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 22:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1898 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471154</link>
      <description>Cash deposits supported by documentary evidence of land-sale proceeds cannot be treated as unexplained. The sale deed and bank statement established that part of the deposits arose from the land sale, requiring deletion of the addition to that extent. The balance deposit remained unexplained because no satisfactory source was established, and the addition was sustained for that portion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>