<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1302 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797428</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on fish oil purchased as an input remains available where the manufacturer cleared the goods at a concessional excise duty rate under Notification No. 01/2011-C.E. The notification&#039;s condition barring credit on inputs or input services applied only to the manufacturer claiming the concession, not to a subsequent buyer who paid duty on the purchase and used the fish oil to manufacture dutiable final products. A later amendment expressly confirming this limitation was consistent with the original notification&#039;s scope. The buyer was consequently eligible for CENVAT credit, and remand for fresh adjudication was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:33:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1302 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797428</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on fish oil purchased as an input remains available where the manufacturer cleared the goods at a concessional excise duty rate under Notification No. 01/2011-C.E. The notification&#039;s condition barring credit on inputs or input services applied only to the manufacturer claiming the concession, not to a subsequent buyer who paid duty on the purchase and used the fish oil to manufacture dutiable final products. A later amendment expressly confirming this limitation was consistent with the original notification&#039;s scope. The buyer was consequently eligible for CENVAT credit, and remand for fresh adjudication was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>