<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1305 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797431</link>
    <description>Steel tubular transmission poles fall under sub-heading 7306.90 as tubes and pipes rather than sub-heading 7308.90. Binding precedent had settled this classification before the relevant levy period, and the subsequent departmental circular only restated that established position. Duty demanded for July and August 2000 therefore did not constitute an impermissible retrospective levy, because the governing classification was already applicable when the liability arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:33:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1305 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797431</link>
      <description>Steel tubular transmission poles fall under sub-heading 7306.90 as tubes and pipes rather than sub-heading 7308.90. Binding precedent had settled this classification before the relevant levy period, and the subsequent departmental circular only restated that established position. Duty demanded for July and August 2000 therefore did not constitute an impermissible retrospective levy, because the governing classification was already applicable when the liability arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>