<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 126 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53372</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalties imposed on M/s. Jagatpal Prem Chand Ltd., finding insufficient evidence to substantiate the Department&#039;s allegations of clandestine removal of excisable goods without duty payment. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of cross-examination of key witnesses and the absence of concrete evidence, such as unaccounted stock or transport documents, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 126 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53372</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalties imposed on M/s. Jagatpal Prem Chand Ltd., finding insufficient evidence to substantiate the Department&#039;s allegations of clandestine removal of excisable goods without duty payment. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of cross-examination of key witnesses and the absence of concrete evidence, such as unaccounted stock or transport documents, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>