<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1322 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797448</link>
    <description>Preferential customs-duty benefits require Customs to follow the prescribed verification process before rejecting a Certificate of Origin. Where Customs doubts a certificate, it must communicate the grounds to the issuing authority and obtain clarification through specific, time-bound verification. General communications concerning other certificates or importers do not establish that an importer&#039;s certificate is non-authentic. Documentary certificates cannot be displaced by assumptions about a supplier&#039;s business profile, unverified electronic communications, or third-party statements. Retracted and uncorroborated statements, particularly where not tested through examination and cross-examination, cannot substitute for verification. Failure to undertake certificate-specific verification renders denial of preferential duty and consequential recovery, confiscation, fine and penalties unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:33:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1322 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797448</link>
      <description>Preferential customs-duty benefits require Customs to follow the prescribed verification process before rejecting a Certificate of Origin. Where Customs doubts a certificate, it must communicate the grounds to the issuing authority and obtain clarification through specific, time-bound verification. General communications concerning other certificates or importers do not establish that an importer&#039;s certificate is non-authentic. Documentary certificates cannot be displaced by assumptions about a supplier&#039;s business profile, unverified electronic communications, or third-party statements. Retracted and uncorroborated statements, particularly where not tested through examination and cross-examination, cannot substitute for verification. Failure to undertake certificate-specific verification renders denial of preferential duty and consequential recovery, confiscation, fine and penalties unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>