<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sub-contract cost deductions allowed where contractual arrangements showed the assessee bore transportation, labour cess and copy charges.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102956</link>
    <description>Transportation expenditure incurred before contract work was handed to a sub-contractor remained deductible where a memorandum recorded the parties&#039; prior understanding that the assessee would bear that cost. The later execution of the definitive sub-contract did not displace that arrangement, and no duplicate claim by the sub-contractor was alleged; the disallowance was therefore deleted. Labour cess and copy charges deducted from the assessee&#039;s contract bills under tender terms were also deductible because the assessee incurred and bore them, their genuineness was undisputed, and the sub-contractor had not claimed them. The related disallowance of sublet expenses was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:33:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:33:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Sub-contract cost deductions allowed where contractual arrangements showed the assessee bore transportation, labour cess and copy charges.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102956</link>
      <description>Transportation expenditure incurred before contract work was handed to a sub-contractor remained deductible where a memorandum recorded the parties&#039; prior understanding that the assessee would bear that cost. The later execution of the definitive sub-contract did not displace that arrangement, and no duplicate claim by the sub-contractor was alleged; the disallowance was therefore deleted. Labour cess and copy charges deducted from the assessee&#039;s contract bills under tender terms were also deductible because the assessee incurred and bore them, their genuineness was undisputed, and the sub-contractor had not claimed them. The related disallowance of sublet expenses was deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:33:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>