<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Owner knowledge of share allotment and buy-back defeats benami classification and prevents confirmation of provisional attachment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102952</link>
    <description>Section 2(9)(C) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act requires the purported owner to be unaware of, or deny knowledge of, ownership. Acknowledgements by alleged benamidars during cross-examination that they knew of share allotments and buy-backs, and received the consideration in their bank accounts, prevent the transactions from meeting that requirement. Such acknowledgements prevail over conflicting statements made in income-tax proceedings. Potential tax evasion reflected in trade-payable entries does not, by itself, establish a benami transaction. Consequently, provisional attachment cannot be confirmed where the statutory knowledge requirement is not satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:33:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:33:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Owner knowledge of share allotment and buy-back defeats benami classification and prevents confirmation of provisional attachment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102952</link>
      <description>Section 2(9)(C) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act requires the purported owner to be unaware of, or deny knowledge of, ownership. Acknowledgements by alleged benamidars during cross-examination that they knew of share allotments and buy-backs, and received the consideration in their bank accounts, prevent the transactions from meeting that requirement. Such acknowledgements prevail over conflicting statements made in income-tax proceedings. Potential tax evasion reflected in trade-payable entries does not, by itself, establish a benami transaction. Consequently, provisional attachment cannot be confirmed where the statutory knowledge requirement is not satisfied.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 10:33:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>