<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1669 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471122</link>
    <description>Limitation for an intra-court appeal under the Companies Act requires filing within 30 days. A time-barred appeal should be accompanied by an affidavit-supported application explaining sufficient cause; failure to file it simultaneously is procedural and does not automatically require rejection. However, delay in filing both the appeal and the condonation application must be satisfactorily explained through evidence of due diligence. Seeking a certified copy only after limitation expired, coupled with an unexplained assertion that voluminous records required collation, does not establish sufficient cause. The delay-condonation application was therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 20:33:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1669 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471122</link>
      <description>Limitation for an intra-court appeal under the Companies Act requires filing within 30 days. A time-barred appeal should be accompanied by an affidavit-supported application explaining sufficient cause; failure to file it simultaneously is procedural and does not automatically require rejection. However, delay in filing both the appeal and the condonation application must be satisfactorily explained through evidence of due diligence. Seeking a certified copy only after limitation expired, coupled with an unexplained assertion that voluminous records required collation, does not establish sufficient cause. The delay-condonation application was therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>