<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 200 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53352</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order by the Commissioner of Central Excise in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, in a case involving the demand for additional excise duty under Notification No. 55/91-CE. Citing precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, clearing them from the demands for the specified periods, as there was no intent to evade duty and the demands were deemed time-barred. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant consequential relief, if applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:19:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 200 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53352</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the adjudication order by the Commissioner of Central Excise in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, in a case involving the demand for additional excise duty under Notification No. 55/91-CE. Citing precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, clearing them from the demands for the specified periods, as there was no intent to evade duty and the demands were deemed time-barred. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, granting the appellant consequential relief, if applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>