<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1215 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797341</link>
    <description>Transponder bandwidth capacity supplied by foreign satellite service providers constituted telecommunication service because it enabled satellite-based connectivity between points on earth. Under the Finance Act, 1994, telecommunication service was taxable only when supplied by a telegraph authority licensed under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; foreign providers did not meet that condition. Such services could not be reclassified as Business Support Service merely because they fell outside the telecommunication-service taxability clause. Bandwidth capacity did not amount to the infrastructural or commercial support covered by Business Support Service. Consequently, reverse-charge service tax was not payable as Business Support Service, and the proceedings were dropped.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1215 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797341</link>
      <description>Transponder bandwidth capacity supplied by foreign satellite service providers constituted telecommunication service because it enabled satellite-based connectivity between points on earth. Under the Finance Act, 1994, telecommunication service was taxable only when supplied by a telegraph authority licensed under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885; foreign providers did not meet that condition. Such services could not be reclassified as Business Support Service merely because they fell outside the telecommunication-service taxability clause. Bandwidth capacity did not amount to the infrastructural or commercial support covered by Business Support Service. Consequently, reverse-charge service tax was not payable as Business Support Service, and the proceedings were dropped.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>