<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1230 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797356</link>
    <description>Orders of the National Company Law Tribunal must ordinarily be challenged through the statutory appellate remedy before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. Writ jurisdiction should not be invoked against an NCLT order where no sufficient reason exists to bypass that alternative remedy. High Courts should therefore decline to entertain such writ applications, leaving aggrieved parties to pursue the appropriate remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1230 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797356</link>
      <description>Orders of the National Company Law Tribunal must ordinarily be challenged through the statutory appellate remedy before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. Writ jurisdiction should not be invoked against an NCLT order where no sufficient reason exists to bypass that alternative remedy. High Courts should therefore decline to entertain such writ applications, leaving aggrieved parties to pursue the appropriate remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>