<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1252 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797378</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars requires independent proof of the statutory conditions. Acceptance without variation of income declared in a return filed in response to a reassessment notice does not, by itself, establish concealment or inaccurate particulars. Delayed filing of the original return and filing only after reassessment proceedings begin are insufficient grounds for penalty. Reassessment does not automatically justify separate penalty proceedings; the Revenue must demonstrate concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars independently. On these principles, penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was unsustainable and required deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1252 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797378</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars requires independent proof of the statutory conditions. Acceptance without variation of income declared in a return filed in response to a reassessment notice does not, by itself, establish concealment or inaccurate particulars. Delayed filing of the original return and filing only after reassessment proceedings begin are insufficient grounds for penalty. Reassessment does not automatically justify separate penalty proceedings; the Revenue must demonstrate concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars independently. On these principles, penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was unsustainable and required deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>