<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1284 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797410</link>
    <description>Regular bail under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita was considered for alleged offences involving GST evasion through unaccounted purchases, storage and sales without invoices, and discrepancies between physical and recorded stock. The alleged conduct involved substantial tax evasion, while multiple notices had been issued and the investigation remained pending. Given the serious gravity attributed to the alleged economic offence, regular bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1284 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797410</link>
      <description>Regular bail under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita was considered for alleged offences involving GST evasion through unaccounted purchases, storage and sales without invoices, and discrepancies between physical and recorded stock. The alleged conduct involved substantial tax evasion, while multiple notices had been issued and the investigation remained pending. Given the serious gravity attributed to the alleged economic offence, regular bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>