<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1288 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797414</link>
    <description>Rectification of an ex parte GST adjudication under Section 161 cannot be used for a merits-based reconsideration that issues a further ex parte demand without notice. Complete failure to consider the assessee&#039;s replies and denial of a hearing constitute a fundamental procedural defect requiring recall of the original order and fresh adjudication. Where rectification adversely affects the assessee, prior notice and compliance with natural justice are mandatory; the exception permitting rectification without notice does not apply merely because the demand is reduced. The further ex parte order was invalid, and fresh determination required an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1288 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797414</link>
      <description>Rectification of an ex parte GST adjudication under Section 161 cannot be used for a merits-based reconsideration that issues a further ex parte demand without notice. Complete failure to consider the assessee&#039;s replies and denial of a hearing constitute a fundamental procedural defect requiring recall of the original order and fresh adjudication. Where rectification adversely affects the assessee, prior notice and compliance with natural justice are mandatory; the exception permitting rectification without notice does not apply merely because the demand is reduced. The further ex parte order was invalid, and fresh determination required an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>