<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (8) TMI 1294 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797420</link>
    <description>Denial of a meaningful pre-decisional hearing before an order-in-original raises the audi alteram partem requirement and potential breach of natural justice. The dispute also concerns the availability of writ jurisdiction where an alternative statutory remedy exists. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s judgment and dismissed the special leave petitions, leaving the High Court&#039;s disposition undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (8) TMI 1294 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797420</link>
      <description>Denial of a meaningful pre-decisional hearing before an order-in-original raises the audi alteram partem requirement and potential breach of natural justice. The dispute also concerns the availability of writ jurisdiction where an alternative statutory remedy exists. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s judgment and dismissed the special leave petitions, leaving the High Court&#039;s disposition undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=797420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>