<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rejection of audited books requires specific accounting defects; fixed-rate profit estimation on pass-through reimbursements was rejected.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102921</link>
    <description>Rejection of audited books under section 145(3) requires specific defects in the accounts and cannot rest solely on non-compliance with sample third-party notices issued under section 133(6). Where the Assessing Officer verified the supplied particulars and the receipts of an HR outsourcing provider substantially comprised salary and statutory reimbursements as pass-through costs, treating total gross receipts as income and applying a fixed profit rate lacked a rational basis. The estimated addition was therefore arbitrary; deletion by the Commissioner (Appeals) was sustained and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rejection of audited books requires specific accounting defects; fixed-rate profit estimation on pass-through reimbursements was rejected.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102921</link>
      <description>Rejection of audited books under section 145(3) requires specific defects in the accounts and cannot rest solely on non-compliance with sample third-party notices issued under section 133(6). Where the Assessing Officer verified the supplied particulars and the receipts of an HR outsourcing provider substantially comprised salary and statutory reimbursements as pass-through costs, treating total gross receipts as income and applying a fixed profit rate lacked a rational basis. The estimated addition was therefore arbitrary; deletion by the Commissioner (Appeals) was sustained and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>