<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 226 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53334</link>
    <description>Unutilised Modvat credit attributable to inputs used in exported goods was treated as refundable where the credit remained accumulated and could not be effectively adjusted against duty on final products. The discussion applies Notification No. 29/96-C.E. (N.T.), Rule 57F of the Central Excise Rules and Section 11B of the Central Excise Act to the effect that substantive refund entitlement is not defeated merely because the assessee might have used the credit for home clearances or because procedural requirements were imperfectly complied with. The key point is that, where the statutory conditions are otherwise satisfied and the credit is linked to exported goods, procedural irregularities do not bar refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:42:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 226 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53334</link>
      <description>Unutilised Modvat credit attributable to inputs used in exported goods was treated as refundable where the credit remained accumulated and could not be effectively adjusted against duty on final products. The discussion applies Notification No. 29/96-C.E. (N.T.), Rule 57F of the Central Excise Rules and Section 11B of the Central Excise Act to the effect that substantive refund entitlement is not defeated merely because the assessee might have used the credit for home clearances or because procedural requirements were imperfectly complied with. The key point is that, where the statutory conditions are otherwise satisfied and the credit is linked to exported goods, procedural irregularities do not bar refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>