<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Anticipatory bail in money-laundering matters may be denied where prima facie evidence, grave allegations and investigative non-cooperation coexist.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102898</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail in a money-laundering investigation may be refused where prima facie material indicates serious allegations and the accused has not cooperated with the investigation. The High Court considered alleged control of illegal call-centre operations, layering of proceeds through shell entities and hawala channels, unexplained bank credits, failure to join the investigation, an incomplete statement, and unanswered financial-trail queries. It clarified that custodial interrogation need not be indispensable for refusing anticipatory bail; the gravity of the allegations and prima facie material can independently weigh against discretionary protection. Anticipatory bail was declined without addressing the merits of the investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Anticipatory bail in money-laundering matters may be denied where prima facie evidence, grave allegations and investigative non-cooperation coexist.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102898</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail in a money-laundering investigation may be refused where prima facie material indicates serious allegations and the accused has not cooperated with the investigation. The High Court considered alleged control of illegal call-centre operations, layering of proceeds through shell entities and hawala channels, unexplained bank credits, failure to join the investigation, an incomplete statement, and unanswered financial-trail queries. It clarified that custodial interrogation need not be indispensable for refusing anticipatory bail; the gravity of the allegations and prima facie material can independently weigh against discretionary protection. Anticipatory bail was declined without addressing the merits of the investigation.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102898</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>