<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cheating and criminal conspiracy require proof of dishonest inducement and a proven agreement, not suspicion or selective attribution.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102893</link>
    <description>Cheating by dishonest inducement requires a fraudulent or dishonest false representation intended to deceive, followed by the complainant acting on it through delivery of property or the requisite harm. Criminal conspiracy requires proof beyond reasonable doubt of an agreement or prior meeting of minds to commit an illegal act or a lawful act by illegal means; suspicion, association, or relationship is insufficient. Where directors are accused of corporate misconduct, cogent evidence must distinguish their individual dishonest acts, participation, or benefit from the roles of directors who were not prosecuted. Unsupported allegations of collateral security or mortgage creation do not establish dishonest inducement or conspiracy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cheating and criminal conspiracy require proof of dishonest inducement and a proven agreement, not suspicion or selective attribution.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102893</link>
      <description>Cheating by dishonest inducement requires a fraudulent or dishonest false representation intended to deceive, followed by the complainant acting on it through delivery of property or the requisite harm. Criminal conspiracy requires proof beyond reasonable doubt of an agreement or prior meeting of minds to commit an illegal act or a lawful act by illegal means; suspicion, association, or relationship is insufficient. Where directors are accused of corporate misconduct, cogent evidence must distinguish their individual dishonest acts, participation, or benefit from the roles of directors who were not prosecuted. Unsupported allegations of collateral security or mortgage creation do not establish dishonest inducement or conspiracy.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 08:28:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>