<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 285 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53333</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on welding electrodes used for repair, maintenance and installation of machinery was not admissible as &quot;inputs&quot; under the enlarged definition effective from 1-3-2001. The amended definition allowed credit only where the goods were used in the manufacture of capital goods that were themselves used in the factory. On the admitted facts, welding electrodes used for maintenance or installation did not satisfy that requirement, so the credit claim failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:41:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 285 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53333</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on welding electrodes used for repair, maintenance and installation of machinery was not admissible as &quot;inputs&quot; under the enlarged definition effective from 1-3-2001. The amended definition allowed credit only where the goods were used in the manufacture of capital goods that were themselves used in the factory. On the admitted facts, welding electrodes used for maintenance or installation did not satisfy that requirement, so the credit claim failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>