<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1875 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471097</link>
    <description>Interest expenditure covered by a valid Form 26A could not be disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) where the payee certified payment of tax on that interest income. The certification established tax payment on a substantial part of the interest, and a difference between the certified amount and the total interest debited did not justify rejecting the certificate absent any finding that it was false or incorrect. Accordingly, the disallowance was deleted to the extent supported by Form 26A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 19:01:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1875 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471097</link>
      <description>Interest expenditure covered by a valid Form 26A could not be disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) where the payee certified payment of tax on that interest income. The certification established tax payment on a substantial part of the interest, and a difference between the certified amount and the total interest debited did not justify rejecting the certificate absent any finding that it was false or incorrect. Accordingly, the disallowance was deleted to the extent supported by Form 26A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>