<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1879 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471101</link>
    <description>Cash deposits in a proprietary trading business bank account were supported by the nature of cash sales and purchases and by evidence of continuing cash availability in preceding and succeeding years. Failure to maintain regular books of account did not by itself justify disregarding the business evidence. The deposits were therefore not treated as unexplained money, and the proposed addition was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 19:01:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1879 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471101</link>
      <description>Cash deposits in a proprietary trading business bank account were supported by the nature of cash sales and purchases and by evidence of continuing cash availability in preceding and succeeding years. Failure to maintain regular books of account did not by itself justify disregarding the business evidence. The deposits were therefore not treated as unexplained money, and the proposed addition was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>