<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1872 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471086</link>
    <description>Bank deposits cannot be taxed twice through inconsistent characterisation as both unexplained credits based on peak balance and business receipts subject to presumptive taxation. Where the same deposits have already been treated as business turnover and taxed on a presumptive basis, a separate addition for unexplained peak deposits is unsustainable. The peak-deposit addition was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1872 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471086</link>
      <description>Bank deposits cannot be taxed twice through inconsistent characterisation as both unexplained credits based on peak balance and business receipts subject to presumptive taxation. Where the same deposits have already been treated as business turnover and taxed on a presumptive basis, a separate addition for unexplained peak deposits is unsustainable. The peak-deposit addition was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>