<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1668 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471089</link>
    <description>Discretionary bail in an alleged GST-evasion prosecution was declined because the alleged large-scale tax evasion, undisclosed pending criminal cases including earlier GST-evasion matters, and alleged prison misconduct indicated material antecedents and a prospect of repeated similar activity. Non-disclosure of those antecedents weighed against discretionary relief. The applicant was therefore not entitled to bail at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:42:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=918042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1668 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471089</link>
      <description>Discretionary bail in an alleged GST-evasion prosecution was declined because the alleged large-scale tax evasion, undisclosed pending criminal cases including earlier GST-evasion matters, and alleged prison misconduct indicated material antecedents and a prospect of repeated similar activity. Non-disclosure of those antecedents weighed against discretionary relief. The applicant was therefore not entitled to bail at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>