<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 214 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53322</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a fabric processor, in a case concerning the valuation of processed fabrics for duty payment. The tribunal agreed with the appellant that the assessable value should include processing charges and profit, not solely the declared value for excise duty payment. They emphasized that notional valuations like MRP or tariff-based values may not accurately reflect the true cost. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty, citing legal principles established by previous court decisions and supporting the appellant&#039;s valuation method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:13:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=91799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 214 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53322</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a fabric processor, in a case concerning the valuation of processed fabrics for duty payment. The tribunal agreed with the appellant that the assessable value should include processing charges and profit, not solely the declared value for excise duty payment. They emphasized that notional valuations like MRP or tariff-based values may not accurately reflect the true cost. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the duty demand and penalty, citing legal principles established by previous court decisions and supporting the appellant&#039;s valuation method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>